Thank you for this reminder. I have found among the 'young restless, reformed' crowd a kind of, what I would call - 'hyper-calvinism' - that reacts against any thought of God's 'emotions' etc. Impassability as a doctrine seems to put the possibility of altering God's mind out of the picture. How is it best to respond to these ideas? (other than just sending this article, :) )
Thank you for this reminder. I have found among the 'young restless, reformed' crowd a kind of, what I would call - 'hyper-calvinism' - that reacts against any thought of God's 'emotions' etc. Impassability as a doctrine seems to put the possibility of altering God's mind out of the picture. How is it best to respond to these ideas? (other than just sending this article, :) )
They just need to read the Bible and quit relying on philosophical theism, which is tinged with Gnosticism. So many Reformed writers (like Packer, Nash, and Frame) have addressed the problem. Thank you for the encouragement!
Thank you for this reminder. I have found among the 'young restless, reformed' crowd a kind of, what I would call - 'hyper-calvinism' - that reacts against any thought of God's 'emotions' etc. Impassability as a doctrine seems to put the possibility of altering God's mind out of the picture. How is it best to respond to these ideas? (other than just sending this article, :) )
They just need to read the Bible and quit relying on philosophical theism, which is tinged with Gnosticism. So many Reformed writers (like Packer, Nash, and Frame) have addressed the problem. Thank you for the encouragement!